Legal Opinion

Kaiser Gypsum Company v. Jordan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1966No. 4436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Plaintiff’s petitiori, alleged he furnished information to defendant concerning gypsum deposits; that defendant■ expressly agreed to pay him a specified royalty in return for the information and his skill and labor in developing further data, for which judgment was prayed; that pursuant to this agreement plaintiff and defendant entered upon a joint venture to investigate the deposits and obtain a lease of lands on which they were located. Alternatively, it was averred that plaintiff furnished information and services, which defendant accepted, used and acted upon, under a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Brown v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gill v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Modica v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Price v. WratherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Mann v. RisingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Fry v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Allan Construction Co. v. Parker Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. McKellar v. MarsacCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API