Legal Opinion

Carter v. Forstrom

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1986No. CC82-742; CA A35245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant Rune appeals from a judgment entered against him in this breach of contract case. On April 11, 1981, plaintiff agreed in writing to sell all the stock of his business, Coast Title, to defendant Forstrom. Plaintiff commenced this action against Forstrom alone in September, 1982. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in January, 1984, adding Rune as defendant, and alleging that Forstrom was Rune’s agent in entering the contract and that Rune materially aided and participated in entering and breaching the agreement. Forstrom confessed judgment in July, 1984. After a trial to the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaines v. VandecarOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bonnevier v. Dairy Cooperative Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Engelstad v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Porras v. BassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. New Crawford Valley, Ltd. v. BenedictColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API