Legal Opinion

O'Flynn & Son v. Ebelhaar

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

AfMming.

*504Elizabeth Ebelhaar and Tom Fenwick, her tenant, sold their crops of tobáceo, consisting of about 9,000 pounds, to E. E. O’Flynn & Son, who refused to pay the contract price for the third delivery. Thereupon, Elizabeth Ebelhaar and Fenwick brought this suit to recover the amount claimed to be due. O’Flynn & Son counterclaimed for damages in the sum of $520.00 because the plaintiffs failed' to deliver tobacco of the quality contracted for. On the first trial the court instructed the jury to find for plaintiffs On appeal this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. R. E. O'Flynn & Son v. EbelharCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ware v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API