Legal Opinion
Alsteen v. Wauleco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 14, 2011No. 2010AP1643PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Amber Alsteen and sixty-nine others (collectively, Alsteen) appeal an order dismissing their personal injury claims against Wauleco, Inc., and *476Sentry Insurance (collectively, Wauleco). Alsteen alleges that, while living in Wausau's River Street neighborhood, she was exposed to carcinogenic chemicals that Wauleco improperly released from the nearby Crestline window factory. Alsteen does not allege that she suffers any present health problems due to this exposure; however, she contends she is at an increased risk of developing cancer in the future. She therefore seeks damages for future…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re WagnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Jayden Varline, Brian Richards, Jonica Richards, Jensen Richards, Daniel Paul, Elizabeth Paul, Annette Schaetzl, Trevor Cunningham, Emily Cunningham, Richard Rubow, Michael Heise, Stacy Heise, Amanda Zastrow, Steven Zastrow, Scott Towle, Jessica Towle, Perry Redeker, Ruth Redeker, Matthew Brill, Janet Ostrowski, Tom Feltz, Thomas Suleski, Jerilyn Landrum, Lance Kelly, Jennifer Kelly, and others similarly situated v. The 3M CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- Smith-Williams, Consuela v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019