Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Boerum

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to dismiss a complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtS. B. Strong, J.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to redeem.' *295a large number of lots in Williamsburgh, from a mortgage upon them and other lands, made by John S. McKibben and Thomas Nicholls to Abraham, Henry and William Boerum. The mortgage was dated and executed on March 30, 1836, and was given to secure the payment of $39,000, with interest, on or before April 1, 1841, and was recorded on the second day after its daté. On the same day McKibben and Nicholls conveyed the one-fourth part of the mortgaged premises to George D. Strong, and on December 18, 1837, Nicholls conveyed his remaining estate in said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sedgwick v. ClevelandNew York Court of Chancery · 1838

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Secombe v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Gibson v. GreenMississippi Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API