Legal Opinion

Brzozowski v. Boutinger

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

This is an action to recover damages in the sum of $5,000 for breach of covenants contained in a full covenant and warranty deed from the defendants to the plaintiffs, dated *381February 23, 1927. The case was tried by the court without a jury on an agreed statement, of facts, dated October 16, 1942, which incorporates by reference the record on appeal of a prior action unsuccessfully prosecuted by the plaintiffs and,more specifically, the “ agreed statement of facts ”, dated February 21, 1939, printed in said record.

The defendants became the owners of the property described in the complaint on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Tax Lien Co. v. . SchultzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Dunham v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Bradt v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neshewat v. SalemDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. EynardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1975
  3. Mosher v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API