Legal Opinion

Margaret Vaughn v. Sutton Ruoff

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2001No. 00-3223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIETOR, Senior District Judge.

Defendant-appellant Sutton Ruoff and defendants Sandra Utz and Patricia Mar ceau are social service workers for the Clinton County Division of Family Services in Missouri. Plaintiffs-appellees Margaret and Kevin Vaughn Sr. brought suit against them for violations of several provisions of the United States and Missouri Constitutions based on the claim that defendants compelled Margaret, by coercive means, to submit to tubal ligation sterilization. The district court 2 granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims except the federal and state due…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. RuoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. Vaughn v. RuoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Salcido v. City of Las VegasDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API