Legal Opinion

United States v. Morris

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 14, 2001No. NMCM 9901551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORMAN, Senior Judge:

The appellant stands convicted by a general court-martial consisting of a military judge sitting alone. At trial the appellant plead guilty to carnal knowledge, sodomy, indecent acts, and indecent liberties. All offenses were committed against his daughter, who was under the age of 16 at the time of the offenses. The military judge determined that the appellant’s pleas were providently entered and found the appellant guilty consistent with his pleas. The appellant’s offenses violated Articles 120, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 920,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. SloanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. DingerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  3. United States v. BeganiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API