Legal Opinion
Laurino v. Hewman
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. Barron Hill, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules ,of Civil Practice. The facts are not in dispute.
Plaintiff and defendant entered into a lease agreement containing among other things an option to purchase the real property leased at the expiration of the lease, i.e., as follows:
“ The tenant is hereby given the option to purchase the said leased premises at the termination of the lease, being the 31st day of July 1960 at a purchase price of $30,000.00 on the following terms and conditions: By the payment of the sum of $8,000.00 in cash or good certified check and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of AspenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Clark v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Cochran v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Trustees of Hamilton College v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Laurino v. HewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Ludlam Stead, Ltd. v. RezzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- 1020 Park Avenue, Inc. v. RaynorCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978