Legal Opinion
Canales-Yanez v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 29, 2020No. 2209/18PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jose O. Canales-Yanez v. State of Maryland, No. 2209, September Term 2018. Opinion by Beachley, J. BRADY VIOLATION—MATERIALITY After a non-jury trial, defendant was convicted of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and other related offenses. Defendant moved for a new trial on the basis that the State failed to provide the recording and transcript of a police interview of the parents of a State’s witness prior to trial. The witness spoke with police the day after the undisclosed interview with her parents and changed her version of events from what she had previously told police.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Canales-Yanez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021