Legal Opinion

Andre Nathaniel Jackson v. C/O Nicholas Gard, C/O Benjamin Thielen, and C/O Solomon Boateng

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 24, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00030Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ANDRE NATHANIEL JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. OPINION and ORDER C/O NICHOLAS GARD, C/O BENJAMIN THIELEN, 26-cv-30-jdp and C/O SOLOMON BOATENG, Defendants. Plaintiff Andre Nathaniel Jackson is a prisoner proceeding without counsel. I have allowed him to proceed on claims under the Eighth Amendment that correctional officers used excessive force against him and failed to protect him from a knife attack by another prisoner. Dkt. 13. Jackson has filed two documents: (1) his third motion for consideration of the screening order,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ronald Palmer v. Marion County, City of Indianapolis, and Sheriff Jack CotteyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Peate, Joey A. v. McCann, SteveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Guzman v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Curtis Shields v. Thomas DartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API