Legal Opinion
United States v. David Mark Armstrong
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1999No. 98-4905PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judges MICHAEL and MOTZ joined.
OPINION
LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question whether the exclusionary rule applies in federal supervised release revocation hearings. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it does not.
I
In 1992, appellant David Mark Armstrong pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine and cocaine base. He was sentenced to 210 months in prison and five years of supervised release. Pursuant to a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States of America Ex Rel. Herbert Sperling, Relator-Appellant v. Walter v. Fitzpatrick, Warden, West Street House of DetentionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. William Joseph FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Luis Montenegro-RojoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. BranchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- State of Iowa v. Justin Dean ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- United States v. Ronald JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. PenniegraftCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HerderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.