Jensen v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUCKER, Justice.
Summary
In an opinion handed down today we concluded the Indiana Sex Offender Registration Act ("Act"), as applied in that case, violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws contained in the Indiana Constitution. See Wallace v. State, 905 N.E.2d 371 (Ind., 2009). As we explain below the Act does not violate the Indiana constitutional ban on ex post facto laws as applied here.
Facts and Procedural History
In 1999, Todd L. Jensen was charged with count one vicarious sexual gratification, as a Class C felony, count two child molesting, as a Class C felony, and count three…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Lemmon v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Andre Gonzalez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Sidney Lamour Tyson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Brian Hope v. Commissioner of Indiana DepartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.