Legal Opinion
Morris v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 4, 1980No. 52626PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The claimant, E. Ozean Morris, alleges that the Court of Appeals committed error when it vacated the en banc order of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The Court of Appeals held that the claimant’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of her employment.
The claimant was employed as a typist for the Parks and Public Events Department of the City of Oklahoma City, Oklaho ma. She had been directed by her supervisor not to leave the building during working hours except to go to lunch. On January 18, 1978, before noon, two men employed by the department came into claimant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Max E. Landry, Inc. v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Howland v. Douglas Aircraft CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. SantinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Nelson Electric Mfg. Co. v. ShatwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Corbett v. Express PersonnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Turner v. B Sew InnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Barnhill v. Smithway Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.