Legal Opinion

Ardmore Consulting Group, Inc. v. Contreras-Sweet

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 7, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0832PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge

Ardmore Consulting Group, a firm wholly owned by Vineeta Prabhu, applied for admission into' the Smali Business Act’s 8(a) Program, which provides certain competitive benefits to participants. After considering (and then reconsidering) Ard-more’s application, the Small Business Administration concluded that the firm was ineligible for the program. Ardmore then brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act to challenge the SBA’s conclusion, and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are now before the Court. .…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Butte County, Cal. v. HogenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  4. American Radio Relay League, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cognitive Professional Services Inc. v. U.S. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Desa Group, Inc. v. U.S. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. America First Legal Foundation v. CardonaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Basengezi v. GackiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. Kalshiex LLC v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API