Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Prack
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 21, 2016No. 6:14-CV-6425 EAWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Pláintiff Darrell McKinney (“Plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, is an inmate currently housed at Great Meadow Correctional Facility. Plaintiff brings the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants Albert Prack, Thomas Griffin, and Steven Wenderlich (collectively “Defendants”) 1 denied his constitutional rights when he was sentenced to segregated confinement for non-violent offenses. (Dkt.l). Plaintiff claims that the policy of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Caldarola v. CalabreseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Benitez v. SalottiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Colon v. GriffinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Cruz v. NaqviDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Gawlik v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- King v. PuershnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.