Legal Opinion

Smith, Fitzmaurice Co. v. Harris

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 3, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.

Action of indebitatus assumpsit with account annexed. The account is

“1920 September 16th. To 16 dozen men’s fleece union suits sold to you at your request © $24.00...................... $384.00

To interest since due and demanded..... 137.24

$521.24”

Writ dated September 4, 1926. Verdict for the plaintiffs for $521.24. The case comes up on general motion.

In March, 1920, the defendant at his store in Van Burén gave the plaintiffs’ traveling salesman an order for 12 dozen union suits at $24 per dozen to be shipped to the defendant sometime in the Fall from the factory of the manufacturers in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barton v. KaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Rommel v. WingateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Bixler v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
  4. Ex Parte HaleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Dudley v. Poland Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moulton Cavity & Mold, Inc. v. Lyn-Flex Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. J. Wallworth's Sons, Inc. v. Daniel E. Cummings Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API