Legal Opinion

Demers v. Becker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 2, 1941No. 3284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The first argument of the defendant in support of his exception to the denial of a nonsuit is that the cause of the plaintiff’s injury is conjectural. “The jury had to guess whether the accident was caused because of the instructions which the plaintiff claimed to have received, or, because he was negligent in putting his hands into the gears.” This position is not open to the defendant in view of P. L., c. 328, s. 13, which imposes on the defendant the burden of proving contributory negligence. If the plaintiff was negligent, the defendant was bound to prove it. In the absence of evidence,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disalets v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  2. Graham v. WeberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  3. Sirois v. HenrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manor v. GagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  2. Blais v. Flanders Hardware Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  3. Morin v. ChamplinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  4. Townsend v. LegereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API