Legal Opinion
Callision v. Kirkpatrick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 30, 1930No. 19556PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, C.
This is an appeal to reverse the judgment of the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., sustaining general demurrers of the defendants, and dismissing plaintiff’s petition, for the -reason that thes same failed to state facts sufficient to constitute ° cause of action.
W. E. Callison, plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, commenced this action in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., against the defendants, praying that they, and each of them, be enjoined from interfering with the operation by plaintiff of certain vending machines, hereinafter more fully described. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fitts v. McGheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PalmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Shuman v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Eden Musee American Co. v. BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Robertson v. ManeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Rogers v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Hensley v. EubanksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Board of Trustees of Town of Canton v. GunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.