Legal Opinion
Unitel Video, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This CPLR article 78 and Executive Law § 298 proceeding was transferred to this court by order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred M. Ascione, J.), entered March 31, 1988. Determination, dated January 5, 1988, of respondent, Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, which found, after a public hearing, that petitioner, Unitel Video, Inc., had discriminated against complainant, Ms. Charlene D. Singelton, by terminating her as a camera operator on the basis of her sex, and, inter alia, ordering petitioner to (1) either rehire her as a camera operator or offer her a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Imperial Diner, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- New York City Board of Education v. BatistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Quality Care, Inc. v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Barton v. New York City Commission On Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Matter of Grumman Aerospace Corp v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.