Smith v. Whalen
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action for damages because of defendant’s criminal conversation with plaintiff’s wife. A jury awarded plaintiff $25,000 as damages. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
In our review, we take the trial record as it stands and so must defendant’s present counsel on appeal. In his answer and at trial, defendant admitted having sexual intercourse with plaintiff’s wife while she was married to plaintiff. During opening statement, defendant’s counsel referred to plaintiff’s possible damages resulting from defendant’s conduct by stating:
“It will be our position, Ladies…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- DeArmon v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rinker v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Fennell v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Bayer v. American Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fust v. FrancoisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Thomas v. SiddiquiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Empire District Electric Co. v. CoverdellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Norris v. BarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Obaidullah v. KabirMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.