Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1933No. 15460PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed A. L. Woodring by cutting him with a knife. Supporting the charge, the testimony of the state was, in substance, as follows: Appellant and his family had been visiting in the home of B. H. Woodring, a brother of deceased. On the day of the homicide, appellant had been drinking. Returning to the home of B. H. Woodring, he began to curse and abuse his (appellant’s) wife. B. H. Wood-ring objected to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Hathcock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Edmondson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Holcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Stroud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fambro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Woodley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Joubert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Schmidt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API