Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Loizzo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 1998No. 87 CIV. 6024(MJL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of defendant police officers Leonard Loizzo and Daniel Fischer (“Individual Defendants”) and defendant Mount Vernon Police Department (“Municipal Defendant”) (collectively, “Defendants”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(b) (“Rule 42(b)”), to bifurcate the trials of the Individual Defendants and the Municipal Defendant. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the Rule 42(b) motion. The first trial will cover all claims against the Individual Defendants. The second trial, if necessary, will cover all…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John J. Pitchell v. James F. Callan, Gregory Sargis and City of Hartford, David J. Lesser and Steven Del Sole, Special MastersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Rupert GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Medina v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Brown Bottling Group, Inc. v. Imperial Trading Co., L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
- McKoy v. Suffolk County CorrectionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025