Curtis v. Siebrand Bros. Circus & Carnival Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBudge, Justice
I concur in that part of the majority opinion in which it is held “the trial court was without jurisdiction to render or enter judgment for punitive damages. Consequently, the judgment therefor is void.” No punitive damages were alleged in the complaint, other than in the prayer thereof, which is no part of the complaint upon which liability may be bottomed.
I dissent from that part of the majority opinion reversing the trial court’s order and judgment setting aside and vacating the default judgment.
Judgments by default are not favored. The granting or refusing to set aside a default judgment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Day v. DayIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Holzeman v. HenneberryIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Humphreys v. Idaho Gold Mines Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Pittock v. BuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Reynolds v. Gladys Belle Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.