Legal Opinion

Young v. Travelers' Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1933No. 887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This action is on a policy issued by ap-pellee to Orlando Halliburton insuring his life against loss in the sum of $7,500 resulting from bodily injuries, effected directly and independently of all other causes through accidental means. Suicide, sane or insane, is excepted from the risk. Appellant is the sister of the insured, and she was named as beneficiary. The complaint charges that insured on the afternoon of October 14, 1931, died as a result of an accidental fall from a window on the seventh floor of the Mincks Hotel in the city of Tulsa. The answer denies that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Toledo Traction Co. v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  4. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. HattenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Frankel v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Insul-Wool Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Leeper v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  4. Sperber v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Wells v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API