Legal Opinion

Morgenthau v. Citisource, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

*84OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin B. Stecher, J.

This is a motion for final judgment in a forfeiture action (CPLR art 13-A). As it is a civil action (CPLR 1311 [1]) a motion for judgment must be judged by the standards of any motion for summary judgment in a civil action (see, e.g., CPLR 3212, 3213, 3211 [c]); that is, that "there is no substantial fact issue in the case and therefor no necessity for a trial” (Siegel, NY Prac § 278, at 333).

The sorry facts of this case are too well known (see, 68 NY2d 211, revg 121 AD2d 353, on remittitur 128 AD2d 459) to require detailed repetition: suffice to say…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Morgenthau v. Citisource, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Matter of Cooper (Mccauley)New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Kaplan v. RitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Morgenthau v. Citisource, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API