Bunzel v. Maas
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the City Court of Selma. ■ Tried before the Hon. J. W. Mabry. This was a suit brought by the appellant, J. Bunzel, against the appellees, Maas & Schwarz; and counted upon six promissory notes for $500 each. The notes were executed by I. L. Levy.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the City Court of Selma. ■ Tried before the Hon. J. W. Mabry. This was a suit brought by the appellant, J. Bunzel, against the appellees, Maas & Schwarz; and counted upon six promissory notes for $500 each. The notes were executed by I. L. Levy. The notes were executed on February 24, 1892, and were payable to the appellees a't the Commercial Bank of Selma, on different and specified days, from the 20th of September, to the 25th of October, 1892, and endorsed in blank by the appellees. Sixteen pleas were filed by the defendant. The plaintiff’s demurrers were sustained to pleas…
1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.
This suit was brought by appellant, as the holder and owner of six negotiable promissory notes, for $500 each, which were made on the 24th of February, 1892, by I. L. Levy, and endorsed by the appellees, who were sued as such endorsers.
1. The tenth plea alleges that the endorsements were made without consideration, but at once qualifies this statement by averring that they were made upon the promise of the maker to use said endorsements for the pui’pose of redeemixxg cex'tain collaterals pledged for a debt of his to another party, promisixig to pay off'the incLebtedxxess for which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Herring, Farrell & Sherman v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Converse v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Citizens' Bank v. RhutaselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Van Horn v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mallory S. S. Co. v. DruhanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Standard Motorcar Co. v. McMahonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Farley National Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Bank of Orland v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Dixon v. Hotel Tutwiler Operating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.