Legal Opinion

Rakhman v. Zusstone

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1997No. 96-SC-497-DGPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STUMBO, Justice.

At issue herein is the proper disposition of real property purchased during the course of a lengthy, non-marital relationship and placed only in the name of one party. It is undisputed that Appellee, hereinafter “Zus-stone,” was the source of the funds used in the purchase of the home. Appellant, hereinafter “Rakhman,” contends that the $415,-000 home was a gift to her on the occasion of the birth of the parties’ second child. Zus-stone argues that the property was held in trust by Rakhman for his benefit. We hold that under the facts of this particular case no trust…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tharp v. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW HAVENCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Twyford v. HuffakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  3. Nunn v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Bryant's Adm'r v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  5. O'Donnell v. O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Peggy Ann Schaefer Spotts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Linda Holt v. John GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Hoheimer v. HoheimerKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API