Rakhman v. Zusstone
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STUMBO, Justice.
At issue herein is the proper disposition of real property purchased during the course of a lengthy, non-marital relationship and placed only in the name of one party. It is undisputed that Appellee, hereinafter “Zus-stone,” was the source of the funds used in the purchase of the home. Appellant, hereinafter “Rakhman,” contends that the $415,-000 home was a gift to her on the occasion of the birth of the parties’ second child. Zus-stone argues that the property was held in trust by Rakhman for his benefit. We hold that under the facts of this particular case no trust…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tharp v. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW HAVENCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Twyford v. HuffakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
- Nunn v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Bryant's Adm'r v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- O'Donnell v. O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peggy Ann Schaefer Spotts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Linda Holt v. John GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Hoheimer v. HoheimerKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.