Legal Opinion
Clute v. Davenport Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 26, 1988No. Civ. No. H-83-817 (MJB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR DECLARATORY RULING
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
Defendant Robert W. Johnson has moved to compel a plaintiff in this action, Dr. Joyce P. Gryboski, to answer certain questions asked during her recent deposition, which her attorneys contend would require disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Mr. Johnson also requests a declaratory judgment that the same questions may be asked of the remaining plaintiffs scheduled to be deposed, without violating either the attorney-client…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ruran v. Beth El Temple of West Hartford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GuptaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Breon v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Gould, Larson, Bennet, Wells & McDonnell, P.C. v. PanicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993