Legal Opinion

Richards v. Jones

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 24, 2014No. Civ. No. 13-2092-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Sue L. Robinson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1. Introduction. Plaintiff George Richards (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the Sussex Correctional Institution (“SCI”), Georgetown, Delaware, proceeds pro se and has been granted in forma pauperis status. He filed this complaint pursuant *633to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming violations of his constitutional rights.1 (D.I.3)

2. Standard of Review. This court must dismiss, at the earliest practicable time, certain in forma pauperis and prisoner actions that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel M. Woods v. Warden Scott Ceresini, et al.District Court, D. Delaware · 2026
  2. Michael T. Washington v. Centene Corporation, et al.District Court, D. Delaware · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API