Legal Opinion

Mirlisena v. Chemlawn Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 13, 1992No. 91-961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

597 So.2d 877 (1992)

Robert MIRLISENA, Appellant,

v.

CHEMLAWN CORPORATION and Scott Wetzel Services, Appellees.

No. 91-961.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 13, 1992.

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1992.

Renee R. Pelzman of Pelzman & Ruska, Coral Gables, for appellant.

G. William Allen, Jr. of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant challenges an order entered by the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying his motion for imposition of interest on an award of attorney's fees. Finding the JCC had become divested of jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. JeffresSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. Mirlisena v. Chemlawn Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Mirlisena v. Chemlawn Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Sullivan v. SullivanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Hernandez v. Village of Kings Creek CondoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Thompson v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API