Legal Opinion

Mirlisena v. Chemlawn Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 1990No. 89-739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

567 So.2d 986 (1990)

Robert E. MIRLISENA, Appellant,

v.

CHEMLAWN CORPORATION & Scott Wetzel Services, Appellees.

No. 89-739.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 4, 1990.

Jerold Feuer, Miami, for appellant.

Carl E. Jenkins of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

ZEHMER, Judge.

The claimant has filed a notice of appeal from an order determining the amount of appellate attorneys' fees to be awarded pursuant to this court's order entered upon appellant's successful appeal in Mirlisena v. Chemlawn Corp., 527 So.2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). We treat the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Zaremba Florida Co. v. KlingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Fumigation Dept. v. PearsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. City of Miami v. KnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Spaulding v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Mirlisena v. Chemlawn Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Public Health Trust/Jackson Memorial Hospital v. SpencerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API