Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Burnetti

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1989No. A89A0656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

The appellee filed suit against the appellant insurer seeking to recover Personal Injury Protection, or “no-fault,” benefits allegedly owed him due to his having been “struck by a motor vehicle” operated by the appellant’s insured. During his deposition, the appellee testified that while using a public telephone located at an intersection, he observed the insured driving towards him on a collision course with the telephone stand. He stated that he was able to jump out of the way and avoid being struck by the vehicle before it collided with the telephone stand but that in doing so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Chapman v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Johnson v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. BurnettiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. KergerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. KergerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. BurnettiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API