Legal Opinion
Saros v. Carlson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 1943PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
There can be no question but that the relation of trustee and cestui que trustent existed between C. A. Carlson and his children until he accounted as trustee and was discharged a few weeks after LeRoy arrived at the agé when he was entitled to claim his share of the trust estate.
“. . . Where the trustee is authorized to sell trust property for the purpose of distributing the proceeds on the termination of the trust, he is empowered tb sell the property after the time for the termination of the trust has arrived.” 3 Scott, . Trusts, p. 1891, sec. 344.
It was during that period of time between…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Zastrow v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Breen v. BreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Town of Nasewaupee v. City of Sturgeon BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.