Legal Opinion

Miller v. C.P. Centers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1984No. 00384 HBG 82PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that (1) appellees’ claim is barred by the doctrine of laches, (2) the lower court did not apply the appropriate legal standard when it found appellants liable for damage to appellees’ property, and (3) the lower court erred in making certain aspects of the damage award. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below.

Appellants, C.P. Centers and Host Hills Associates, are successors-in-interest to the Chambers Ridge apartment development in Swatara Township, Dauphin County. In 1971, Chambers Hills, a limited partnership, began developing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Wade v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Chamberlin v. CiaffoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Courts v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Daughen v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Kowalski, B. v. TOA PA V, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API