Legal Opinion

Ad Fried v. Lakeland Hide & Leather Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Di Falco, J.

Defendant appearing specially moves to set aside service of process and to dismiss this action upon the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over the defendant for the reason that it is a foreign corporation not doing business within this State. The service in question was made upon one Walter Kramer claimed to be defendant’s New York agent and also as managing agent of Eagle Flagg Tanning Corp., also described as defendant’s New York agent.

In support of the application, defendant asserts, in substance, that: it has no certificate authorizing it to do business here; it is a Florida…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. McKeon v. P. J. McGowan & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Vassallo v. SlominAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Clift & Goodrich, Inc. v. Collier Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. H. Heller & Co., Inc. v. Novacor Chemicals Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Fried v. Lakeland Hide & Leather Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Cohen v. Vaughan Bassett Furniture Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  4. Shawe v. Wendy Wilson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Samuels v. LauferNew York Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API