Legal Opinion

Tobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. Pollock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The only question for consideration is whether the restraining order should have been continued to the final hearing, and the rule by which the question is to he determined has often been stated. As now accepted and enforced, the rule is said to have been formulated upon the distinction between common and special injunctions, the former of which were issued in suits brought to restrain an action at law or to enjoin the collection of a judgment recovered in a court of law, and were usually dissolved upon a full denial of the equity set up in the bill. However, the change of procedure by which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Tobacco Growers Cooperative Ass'n v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Jarman v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Heilig and Others v. . Stokes and PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Fort v. Co-Operative Farmers' ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Tobacco Growers Association v. . Harvey Son Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API