Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garnett v. Garnett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 29, 1974No. 340962Published

1DissentSchwab, C. J.

I would modify the divorce decree by eliminating the husband’s obligations to pay the wife’s household and automobile expenses and a monthly sum to her if she becomes unemployed. Specifically, I would hold: (1) the divorce decree, in so far as it relates to alimony, is subject to modification based on a change of circumstances regardless of the fact that the decree incorporates an agreement of the parties; (2) this is true notwithstanding paragraph XI of the agreement that states “remarriage of the wife shall not * * * relieve husband of any of the obligations agreed to herein”; (3) the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Warrington v. WarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API