Garnett v. Garnett
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentSchwab, C. J.
I would modify the divorce decree by eliminating the husband’s obligations to pay the wife’s household and automobile expenses and a monthly sum to her if she becomes unemployed. Specifically, I would hold: (1) the divorce decree, in so far as it relates to alimony, is subject to modification based on a change of circumstances regardless of the fact that the decree incorporates an agreement of the parties; (2) this is true notwithstanding paragraph XI of the agreement that states “remarriage of the wife shall not * * * relieve husband of any of the obligations agreed to herein”; (3) the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Warrington v. WarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.