Dabbs v. Hemken
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of Ouachita, Boyce, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Garland J.
The plaintiff avers that Stevens, the sheriff of the parish of Ouachita, had levied on certain property under two executions in favor of Hemken, and was about to sell it contrary to law. He alleges :
First. That the sheriff refused to seize several tracts of land in the parish when pointed out to him by the present plaintiff, but insisted on taking other property, moveable and immoveable, and advertised it for sale.
Second. That the sheriff did not wait three days before advertising the property for sale.
Third. That the sheriff has not three executions in favor of Hemken, but only two.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- M'Carty v. M'CartySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seale v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Roe v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- State ex rel. Morgan v. KennardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873
- City of New Orleans v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Mullen v. FollainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.