Legal Opinion

State v. Holcomb

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 3, 2016No. 2015AP996-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

HAGEDORN, J.

This case requires us to

interpret Wis. Stat. § 939.617 (2013-14),1 which prescribes minimum sentences for certain child sex offenses. Specifically, the main question before us is whether and when a circuit court may impose less than three years' initial confinement for possession of child pornography. We hold that § 939.617(2) authorizes a circuit court to depart from the minimum and impose either probation or initial confinement of less than three years only if the defendant is not more than forty-eight months older than the child-victim.

*650 Background,

¶ 2. In 2014, Markus…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. TiepelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town Of Delafield v. Central Transport KriewaldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
  3. Praetorian Insurance Company v. Virginia Chau, Administratrix of the Estate of Anh Kim Ho And Air Cargo Carriers, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API