Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pendarvis v. City of Orangeburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 28, 1930No. 12968Published

1DissentJustice Coti-iran

(dissenting) : The dissenting opinion heretofore filed by me- is withdrawn, and this opinion is submitted as a dissenting opinion to the opinion of the majority of the Court, and as a dissenting opinion to the proposed order dismissing the petition for a rehearing.

I respectfully suggest that it does not appear to me to have been apprehended by a majority of the Court, that the appeal in thig case involves the sole issue, a procedural ques tion simply, whether Judge Shipp committed error in referring the case to the master, to take and report the testimony upon the issues presented by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Douglass v. Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Mauldin v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. State Ex Rel. Kirven v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Bryan v. Auditing Board of Williamsburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API