Legal Opinion

Widmer v. Wood

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1967No. 5-4248PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

On October 19, 1961, the parties to this suit entered into a written agreement by which the appellees, Wood and his wife, agreed to sell certain lands in Oklahoma to the appellant, Widmer. For reasons not now important the agreement was never fully executed, and eventually the Woods resumed possession of the property. In 1964 Widmer, acting pro se, brought this action at law, asserting a number of causes of action based upon tbe theory that the Woods had breached the contract and that Widmer was the equitable owner of the lands. This appeal is from a judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reasor-Hill Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Meekins v. MeekinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Hetman v. SchwadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & Machinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Widmer v. Modern Ford Tractor SalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Widmer v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API