Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Association for Retarded Citizens v. Edward J. King

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 18, 1981No. 80-1061PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Edward J. King, et al., appeal what they assert are “orders” of the district court, issued in the five consolidated cases concerning the rights of mentally retarded citizens of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. They claim that these oral “orders,” made during the course of a district court hearing, alter the terms of the Personnel Decree entered into by the parties. We hold that the statements of the district court were not “orders” and that they, therefore, are not appealable.

This action arises out of five cases, filed as class actions on behalf…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. William C. SorrenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Thoms v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Gwathmey v. Town of East HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernard v. BausCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Overton v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Western Electric Company, Inc., Us West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Victor Ramirez, Etc. v. Jaime Rivera-Dueno, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Ricci v. OkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API