Legal Opinion

Tower v. Whip

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1903PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Circuit Court, Mineral County. Action by M. C. Totten against Sandford Whip. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. On death of both parties, personal representatives were substituted, to-wit, E. E. Tower as plaintiff, and E. J. Whip as defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNNON, Judge :

This was an action of debt tried before a special judge, on a negotiable note in the circuit court of Mineral county, brought by M. C. Totten against Sandford Whip, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, from which he has sued out a writ of error.

The defendant pleaded nil debet and filed a plea No. 3 saying that “he did not make or sign the notes sued on,” which were verified by affidavit. The defendant also filed two special pleas, Nos. 2 and 4, to the effect that, a person unknown to Whip, pretending to be a dealer in land and a purchaser of farms, came to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Hanriot v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  4. Amos v. StockertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. First National Bank of Parkersburg v. JohnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smoot v. DingessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Fernández Antonetti v. Corte de Distrito de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Matko v. ZieglerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Johnson v. BeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Parfitt v. Sterling Veneer & Basket Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API