State v. Whaley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He contends he is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge conducted a portion of the jury voir dire in appellant’s absence. We affirm.
Several members of the jury venire responded affirmatively to the trial judge’s inquiry whether anyone had heard news media reports regarding appellant’s case. The trial judge then examined these potential jurors on the record in chambers with only counsel present. The remainder of voir dire was conducted in appellant’s presence.
Of the eleven jurors examined in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- State v. PEE DEE NEWS COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. DishonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987