Legal Opinion

Gerrish v. Panama Canal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 18, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Orders granting defendant’s motions to stay two actions and naming a substitute arbitrator reversed on the law and the motions denied, with costs to plaintiff-appellant on this consolidated appeal. The rule with regard to the power of the court to name a substitute arbitrator pursuant to section 1452 of the Civil Practice Act, and the occasion for its exercise, is clear. (Matter of Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N. Y. 284, 294 et seq.; cf. Matter of Golenbock [Komoroff], 2 A D 2d 742.) Applying the rule to this ease, it is evident that the appointment of Mr. Levine — lawyer,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meltzer v. DanonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API