Gerrish v. Panama Canal Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Orders granting defendant’s motions to stay two actions and naming a substitute arbitrator reversed on the law and the motions denied, with costs to plaintiff-appellant on this consolidated appeal. The rule with regard to the power of the court to name a substitute arbitrator pursuant to section 1452 of the Civil Practice Act, and the occasion for its exercise, is clear. (Matter of Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N. Y. 284, 294 et seq.; cf. Matter of Golenbock [Komoroff], 2 A D 2d 742.) Applying the rule to this ease, it is evident that the appointment of Mr. Levine — lawyer,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meltzer v. DanonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992