Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Taglieri

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Farley, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. The defendants have pleaded the defense of usury in their answer. Plaintiffs do not deny that the underlying loan, for which the subject mortgage was given as collateral security, was usurious, but contend that the loan was made to a corporation and consequently the individual defendants may not properly raise this defense.

In July of 1959 the defendant, Frank J. Taglieri, acting for and on behalf of the Taglieri Corporation, of which he was president, executed a series of notes providing for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Union Dime Savings Institution v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Pink v. L. Kaplan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Ireland v. J.L.'s Auto Sales, Inc.Arcadia Justice Court · 1992
  3. A. J. Armstrong Co. v. Lincoln Finance & Thrift, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
  4. Brint v. Ellin Express Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Your Construction Center, Inc. v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API