Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. Industrial Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

I. The fact.situation .is not seriously in dispute.

The Miller-Toher Auto Company was a .local dealer .in automobiles. For convenience, this concern will be referred to hereinafter as “The Company.”

Early in the year 1924, The Company was in financial difficulties. They had outstanding indebtedness to the bank " of about $5,000, secured by a chattel mortgage on secondhand automobiles. They also were unable to meet their local bills, such as rent, light, heat, water, telephone, etc. They were local representatives of the Chandler-Cleveland- Motor Corporation, manufacturers of automobiles. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Anthon State Bank v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Gage v. SharpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Crossley v. StanleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN LENOX v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Milwaukee Police Association v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Coyle v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Milwaukee Police Association v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Vincent v. VoightWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API