Legal Opinion
Barilla v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 31, 1986No. CIV-85-954-PHX-RCBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BROOMFIELD, District Judge.
On July 19, 1984, Norman Colberg, a bridge mechanic employed by The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, filed a personal injury action against defendant under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51, et seq. (FELA). Plaintiff’s injuries were sustained as a result of an accident which occurred on February 10, 1984 in which half of a push car fell upon him as a result of defendant’s alleged negligence. Plaintiff alleged severe bodily injuries, severe fright, shock and injury to his nervous system, and extreme pain,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tate v. CanonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Edward Conway v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Edward Conway v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Halko v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Marazzato v. Burlington Northern RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Fulk v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Marazzato v. Burlington Northern RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1991