Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Moran Towing & Transp. Co. v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 1, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My decision in this ease is for the libelant on each of the twelve causes of action contained in the libel for the full amount claimed in each, with in*418terest thereon from the dates of the termination of each charter and towage service. There will be one bill of costs granted to the libelant.

These several causes of action arise out of the following situation:

In the New York City 1926 budget there was an appropriation called “Code 2820 General Plant Service.” On December 18, 1925, a resolution was adopted by the board of estimate and apportionment in the following terms :

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. People v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Hastorf v. F. R. Long-W. G. Broadhurst Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  4. The WillieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  5. People v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fonder v. City of South Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. The DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Keller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Sorensen v. City of New York and Four Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. Complaint of Cook Transportation System, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API